Dismissed With Less Than 12 Months’ Service: Your Options

The Unfair Dismissals Acts usually need a year of service. Four routes do not: the section 6(2A) exceptions, the Labour Court under section 20, the Employment Equality Acts, and the notice claim.

Being dismissed with less than 12 months’ service is the point at which many employees are told, by the employer and sometimes by friends, that there is nothing to be done. The Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977-2015 generally require a year, and the probation clause seems to settle it. In fact the first year is covered by a patchwork of other provisions, each with its own forum and its own deadline, and most short-service dismissals fit at least one of them. This guide takes the routes in the order you should check them.

1. Why the Unfair Dismissals Acts Usually Do Not Apply

Section 2(1)(a) of the Acts requires one year’s continuous service with the employer. Section 3 separately excludes a dismissal during a probation or training period where the contract is in writing, the duration of the probation or training is specified in it, and that duration is one year or less. The two provisions overlap, and together they take the ordinary first-year dismissal outside the presumption of unfairness in section 6(1) and the fair-procedure standard in S.I. 146/2000. Two qualifications matter. First, section 3 depends on the paperwork: no written contract, or a contract that does not state how long probation runs, and the exclusion is on weak ground. Second, the European Union (Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions) Regulations 2022 cap probation at six months, or twelve where exceptional circumstances justify it, and forbid a new probation on the renewal of a fixed-term contract, so a long or repeated probation is open to challenge on its own terms. The practice page on dismissal during probation or with under 12 months’ service goes through those conditions.

2. Check the Exceptions First: Section 6(2A)

Before looking at any alternative route, check whether the Acts apply after all. Section 6(2A) removes the service requirement where the dismissal results from:

A dismissal on any of those grounds is deemed unfair outright, the section 3 probation exclusion does not displace them, and the full WRC machinery of section 7 redress applies. The employer will say the real reason was something else, so these cases turn on timing: what the employer knew and when, what was said about performance before that date, and what changed after it. The complete list of grounds that waive the service rule is in automatically unfair dismissals in Ireland.

3. Route One: The Labour Court Under Section 20(1)

Section 20(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 allows a worker to refer a trade dispute to the Labour Court for investigation and a recommendation, and a dispute about a dismissal is a trade dispute for this purpose. The worker undertakes before the investigation to accept the Court’s recommendation. The employer gives no such undertaking, which is why the outcome is non-binding on the employer, and why the route is often described as having no teeth. In practice it has more than the description suggests. The Court examines whether the employer behaved fairly, and the Code of Practice on Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures (S.I. 146/2000) is the obvious measure, so an employer that dismissed on the spot without an allegation in writing, a hearing or an appeal is defending the indefensible. The recommendation is published. Neither the WRC nor the Labour Court awards legal costs, so each side pays its own whatever the result. The combination of a public finding and no costs exposure is what moves employers, and a good proportion of section 20 referrals settle before the Court sits.

4. Route Two: The Employment Equality Acts

The Employment Equality Acts 1998-2015 have no service requirement for a discriminatory dismissal. A dismissal connected to gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, race or membership of the Traveller community is a WRC claim from the first day of employment, and the probation clause is no answer to it. Short-service dismissals generate equality claims because the first months are when an employer discovers what it did not know at interview. A pregnancy announced in month three and a probation review failed in month four is the recurring example. A disability disclosed on a return-to-work form, followed by a dismissal for an inability the employer never tried to accommodate, is another; the duty to consider reasonable accommodation does not wait for a year of service. The evidence is the same as in every dismissal case: the contract, the probation reviews, the emails about performance, and the dates on each relative to the moment the employer learned of the protected characteristic.

5. Route Three: Notice and Wrongful Dismissal

The Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Acts 1973-2005 apply after 13 weeks’ continuous service and entitle the employee to one week’s notice up to two years, with the contract free to provide for more. Pay in lieu is permitted. A dismissal without that notice is a breach, claimable at the WRC under the Minimum Notice Acts or in the civil courts as wrongful dismissal, and there is no one-year rule. The same breach-of-contract logic reaches further than notice. A contract or handbook that promises a disciplinary procedure before dismissal has made a contractual promise, and a probation clause that lets the employer end the contract at any time almost always adds “on notice”. The sums in the first year are small, but the notice claim is often the one that is certain, it is frequently the lever that opens a settlement conversation, and under section 1 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts the notice period fixes the date of dismissal, from which every other deadline runs. The one exception is a summary dismissal for misconduct serious enough to justify it, which forfeits notice only where the employer can prove the misconduct.

6. Route Four: Protected Disclosures

Where the dismissal followed a report of wrongdoing at work, the Protected Disclosures Act 2014, as amended by the Protected Disclosures (Amendment) Act 2022 from 1 January 2023, changes everything about the short-service picture. There is no service requirement. The burden shifts to the employer to show that the dismissal was not penalisation for the disclosure. The compensation cap is 260 weeks’ remuneration rather than 104. And interim relief may be sought in the Circuit Court within 21 days of the dismissal or other penalisation, or such longer period as the Court allows, which is the shortest deadline in Irish employment law and the one most often missed. An employee in the first year who raised a concern about safety, money or legality shortly before being let go should take advice inside that 21-day window, not after it.

7. Choosing and Combining the Routes

The routes are not mutually exclusive, and the right combination depends on four facts: whether the contract is in writing and what it says about probation and notice; how many weeks of service you had on the date of dismissal; whether any section 6(2A) ground, equality ground or disclosure is in play; and what reason the employer gave. The Dismissal Claim Route Finder runs those four questions in three steps. Deadlines are the constraint: six months from the date of dismissal for a WRC complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Acts or the Employment Equality Acts, extendable to twelve only for reasonable cause, and 21 days for interim relief where a protected disclosure is involved. Treat six months from the day you were told as the outer limit for everything, and file earlier. The narrowness of the extension is explained in the WRC six-month time limit and reasonable cause.

8. What to Do This Week

Under a Year of Service? There Is Usually a Route

Bring the contract, the dismissal letter and the dates. One consultation establishes whether an exception applies, which of the Labour Court, equality, notice and disclosure routes fits, and the deadline for each.

Call 01 5827148

Related Reading

Less Than 12 Months’ Service - FAQs

Usually not under the Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977-2015, because section 2(1)(a) requires one year’s continuous service and section 3 excludes a dismissal during a written probation or training period of one year or less. The exceptions in section 6(2A) apply from day one: a dismissal resulting from pregnancy, giving birth or breastfeeding, from availing of maternity, adoptive, paternity, parental, carer’s, parent’s or force majeure leave, from trade union membership or activity, from a protected disclosure, or from exercising rights under the National Minimum Wage Act. Outside those, the Labour Court section 20 route, the Employment Equality Acts and a notice claim remain open.

About the Author

Richard O’Shea, Solicitor practises with Mary Molloy Solicitors (established 1981), acting for employees who have been dismissed or forced out, and for employers defending claims, across Ireland. Richard holds a Diploma in Mediation from the Law Society of Ireland — central to this work, where the WRC offers free mediation and most dismissal claims settle before a hearing. Contact Richard on 01 5827148 or richardoshea@marymolloysolicitors.com.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Every dismissal turns on its own facts, contract and paper trail, and you should obtain advice on your own circumstances before resigning, signing anything or letting a WRC time limit pass. In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.